A generated output can contain features that deserve a rights review even when the prompt did not name another character. The tool's involvement does not settle the question.
WIPO describes industrial-design protection in relation to product appearance. WIPO — Why Industrial Designs Matter to SMEs.
Review the proposed asset
For a generated character, inspect the actual visual proposal and the context in which it will be used. Keep any concern connected to identifiable features rather than declaring an arbitrary percentage of change sufficient.
Use competent judgment
The relevant rights, facts and jurisdiction need appropriate assessment. A different colour, prompt or file name should not be presented as a guarantee of clearance. Keep unresolved concerns visible before the asset moves into production or public promotion.
Source reviewed 25 October 2026. Interpretation and original diagrams: PLUSHIP / Qunhe. Examples are illustrative.
Related reading
A Font Used in Character Packaging Needs Its Own Licence Review
Buying a Character Asset Needs an Evidence Review of What Transfers
A Free Character Giveaway Still Needs a Defined Rights Basis